Problem Validation
User interviews with your target audience. Do they have the problem you think they have? How do they solve it today? Would they pay for a solution?
Validate before you build. User research, prototype testing, and market analysis that tell you whether your product idea is worth the investment—in weeks, not months.
Founders spend 6–12 months and $100K+ building a product, then discover their target users don’t want it. The idea felt obvious. The market seemed large. But no one validated the core assumption before investing in engineering.
We run structured validation—user interviews, prototype testing, landing page experiments, competitive analysis. You get a clear answer: build, pivot, or walk away. Before you spend on engineering.
User interviews with your target audience. Do they have the problem you think they have? How do they solve it today? Would they pay for a solution?
Deep analysis of existing solutions. Feature gaps, pricing models, user complaints. Where is the opportunity?
Interactive Figma prototype of your core user flow. Test the experience before writing any code.
Put the prototype in front of real users. Observe how they interact. Identify confusion points and missing features.
Build a landing page describing your product. Run paid traffic. Measure signups as a proxy for demand.
Clear recommendation: build, pivot, or abandon. Including evidence, user quotes, data, and a prioritized feature list if building.
User interviews. Competitive analysis. Market sizing. Problem hypothesis documentation.
Clickable prototype creation. User testing sessions. Landing page experiment. Data collection.
Synthesize findings. Validation report. Build/pivot/abandon recommendation. MVP scope if building.
Evidence-based answer to the fundamental question: should you build this? No more guessing.
If building, you know exactly which features matter and which don’t. Start with a focused MVP, not a bloated spec.
If the idea doesn’t validate, you saved the entire cost of building it. If it does validate, you saved months of building the wrong features.
We’re engineers and product people—not consultants. Our validation process is designed to feed directly into development.
We won’t tell you your idea is great just to win a development contract. If validation fails, we’ll tell you clearly.
4–6 weeks from kickoff to recommendation. Fast enough to stay ahead of market timing.
If you validate and decide to build, we can move directly into MVP development with zero ramp-up time.
Every founder believes that—and many are right. But validation isn’t just about whether the idea is good. It reveals which features matter most, how users expect the product to work, and what they’ll actually pay. Even confirmed hypotheses benefit from this clarity.
Typically 15–20 interviews with your target audience. We handle recruiting, scheduling, and conducting the interviews. You’re welcome to observe any session.
That’s a success, not a failure. You saved months and tens of thousands of dollars. Our report will also highlight adjacent opportunities—sometimes the biggest insight is a pivot, not an abandonment.
Yes. If you have a live product struggling with retention or growth, we run the same research process to identify why. User interviews and usage analysis reveal whether the problem is the product or the market.
Let’s find out if your product is worth building—before you invest in engineering.
Schedule a Call